I made it, I believe, quite clear that Amanda was forbidden to use her healing magics save at great need, for the sake of her health. Great magic puts a great strain on her body, and could do permanent damage. Apparently, however, I failed to emphasize this enough.
Therefore, I will make myself very clear indeed. Nobody, NOBODY, is to ask Amanda to perform any act of magic for them, for any reason whatsoever. Not a finding spell, not a charm, not the levitation of a pencil. Since clearly concern for her health is not a sufficient deterrent, perhaps the prospect of personal punishment will do the job.
This subject is not open to debate. Nobody is to take this up with Amanda, or in any way make her feel guilty for not being available to be taken advantage of. I trust that this is sufficiently clear to everyone.
Therefore, I will make myself very clear indeed. Nobody, NOBODY, is to ask Amanda to perform any act of magic for them, for any reason whatsoever. Not a finding spell, not a charm, not the levitation of a pencil. Since clearly concern for her health is not a sufficient deterrent, perhaps the prospect of personal punishment will do the job.
This subject is not open to debate. Nobody is to take this up with Amanda, or in any way make her feel guilty for not being available to be taken advantage of. I trust that this is sufficiently clear to everyone.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 12:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 12:48 am (UTC)And the fact is, it's her power, therefore it's her choice.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 12:51 am (UTC)I beg to disagree. As mutants, we have abilities and capabilities that humans quite simply do not. This isn't a statement of superiority, it's simply one of fact. To deny or not use those abilities for ANY reason whatsoever lessens you from what you truly are.
I suppose it's your choice what you want to identify yourself by. If you want to deny that your power is part of what defines you and makes you unique, by all means. People live in denial all the time.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 12:52 am (UTC)Thank you. I've been trying to make this point for a while, but he won't listen to me.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 12:56 am (UTC)If Kyle asks me "Hey, can you make me something so my toes don't tear up the carpet?" - I'm going to help him. Just as I know to say no if he asks "Hey, make me an electro-death ray so I can go wreak havoc on the populace of Salem Center". Yes, Amanda may choose to overextend herself from time to time helping out her people. And if that's too much on anyone's conscience, let it be between them. I'm sure Amanda was forthcoming with Jay about the risks of what he asked for - I happen to know them quite well - and any repercussions should be between them, if you ask me.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:00 am (UTC)Some people aren't good at saying 'no', even when they should. And it's not a bad trait - generosity of spirit is a good thing. But it can be taken advantage of, by the selfish or the simply careless. Amanda is free to make her own choices... but I will not have those choices influenced by the demands of others.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:02 am (UTC)I want to identify myself by being, and I know this sounds shocking and radical, myself. Not the green hair, not the parlor tricks with spoons, not the cooking or the philosophy or geophysics or even my relationship to Alex.
Yes, I can do things most people can't. I can do lots of things that you can't. Should I consider you 'just' a human because you don't have the same mutatation as I do? Should I think you're 'just' a child because I'm a few years older? Should I think I'm 'just' adopted because my mother didn't carry me for nine months?
We are not better. We have different abilities but that doesn't make us better. If we were just our mutations, we would not be anything to shout about. We are human. Trying to define us elsewise is bigotry.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:09 am (UTC)I just think it's the starting point to a lot of more dangerous thoughts. Dangerous for the thinker, and others. -sigh-
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:17 am (UTC)What Amanda chooses to do, I repeat, is her own affair. My original post didn't question her judgement, Forge. It questioned everyone else's. And frankly, the outraged insistance that you should all be entitled to ask whatever you wish of her - for the sake of *her* freedom of choice, of course - is not doing anything to improve my opinion of it. If you are so determined that Amanda should be free to do whatever she wishes, then why are you arguing the right of others to pressure her to do things she doesn't necessarily want to?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:19 am (UTC)Agh. I think I need to chop something into very tiny pieces.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:25 am (UTC)Absolutely.
The 'funny' thing, is, John's probably the only one in the mansion who'd agree with Forge's "just humans" thing, and they'd probably never, ever find anything to agree about again.
Want a sous chef?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:26 am (UTC)And regardless, that line of thought leads to discrimination, segregation, bigotry and eventually devaluation of the value of others.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:31 am (UTC)But we've had this particular discussion before, that seemed to go nowhere.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:34 am (UTC)Bite. Me.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:37 am (UTC)You're always welcome, Kit-kat.
no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-20 01:42 am (UTC)Also. There's a difference between asking her once to do something and backing off if she seems not to want to, even if she doesn't actually say no, and pressuring her.